this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
907 points (98.7% liked)

World News

45286 readers
4592 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pepperprepper@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago (16 children)

Unfortunately I think this also has to do with the changing tech around war. Drones are the new hotness and it is a very good counter to tanks warfare.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Drones don't hold ground, soldiers do. Soldiers that have tanks are going to be more effective than those without them.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm sorry but have you seen what a drone with a grenade does to a tank with an open hatch?

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have you seen a photo of what tanks in combat look like these days? They have cages welded on top of them. Also the hatches can be closed. A lot of tankers like to have the hatch open so the commander can have have more visibility, but it's not a necessity.

There have been ways to take out a tank with missiles for a long time now. The reason why they're still used is that air defenses exist and nothing beats the cost efficiency of moving a big gun close to the enemy and firing a lot of cheap ammunition at them.

Also are you going to tell civilians they can move back into their towns based solely on drones? If the civilians are behind a bunch of tanks, they're safe because the drones will go after the tanks before going after the civilians. You need soldiers to hold ground. A soldier in a tank is going to be harder for a drone to kill than a soldier that's not in a tank.

Yes drones are effective, but drones can't hold ground and keep civilians safe.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

For the price of one tank with cope cages you could buy thousands of drones instead. Tanks are not cost effective anymore. They’re the land equivalent of battleships in an era of aircraft carriers.

The land equivalent of an aircraft carrier is a soldier with a couple of drones in a backpack.

[–] lumony 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I think what people like you are starting to learn is that both are necessary.

A lot about fighting a war is variety. Tanks have their uses, and so do drones.

Trying to argue one can replace the other is stupid and rational adults should not take you seriously as a result.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

They don’t replace each other. Aircraft carriers didn’t replace battleships. It simply made battleships non-viable without a replacement.

What it led to was smaller ships such as corvettes, destroyers, and cruisers taking over the role of battleships but still never replacing them in raw firepower.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem is still getting people from one place to the other

Even with drones taking out tanks, people would rather be in a vehicle than walk

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s what APCs and lighter infantry vehicles are for. They’re not going away. It’s main battle tanks (the ones that cost millions of dollars) that are going away.

Moving troops around in safety is going to be extremely challenging but that’s because of enemy drones, not enemy tanks. Drones can fly recon around a moving personnel carrier just as easily as planes fly recon around an aircraft carrier.

[–] torrentialgrain@lemm.ee 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I haven’t seen a single high ranking general or military strategist that suggests MBTs are going away. It’s just badly informed people on the internet that watched a couple of YT drone clips and think they’ve mastered the art of warfare.

[–] lumony 1 points 8 hours ago

It’s just badly informed people on the internet that watched a couple of YT drone clips and think they’ve mastered the art of warfare.

Describes these forums perfectly.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)