172
submitted 1 year ago by pizzaiolo@slrpnk.net to c/energy@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] echo64@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Great news if you want the free market to solve all the world's problems.

I'm more into ensuring we have a diverse carbon free energy generation future, though, and nuclear is just able to solve the storage problem today, which makes it incredibly valuable to society.

[-] YerbaYerba@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Are there any nuclear plants today that implement energy storage? I know molten salt reactors would be capable but none actually exist as far as I can find.

[-] NotSoCoolWhip@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's not that they are used for storage, but are able to be ramped up or down to meet demand at will., eliminating the need for storage. Kind of like a tankless water heater

[-] schroedingershat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Even with massive overprovision and the rest of europe the inflexibility and geographic concentration of nuclear makes it unable to beat solar + wind with mere minutes of storage in terms of grid penetration.

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
172 points (90.2% liked)

Green Energy

2201 readers
321 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS