1106
submitted 1 year ago by Someonelol@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

A tankie is someone who blindly supports authoritarian regimes simply because they’re anti-west

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This basically shows that what you care about is whether someone is anti-west or not. You are a western nationalist. Not a socialist, and certainly not an internationalist.

[-] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I'm anti-west. I don't care at all if someone is anti-west, and in fact encourage it. But just because a regime is anti-west, that does not mean they're in the right or should be blindly supported.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

You say you're anti west but every time the west says something about a bad guy you believe them

[-] sooper_dooper_roofer@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

loving the absolute ratios these state dept shills are getting

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JamesConeZone@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

How do you differentiate yourself from them as a socialist? What is your theory of power and how it relates to authority, revolutions, and the working class that causes you to make this separation between supporting non-western communist countries and not?

[-] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

I never said that I don't support communist countries. What I do not support are abuses of power by authoritarian leaders, even if they claim to be abusing their power in order to bring about a communist state.

Tankies accept most/all atrocities committed by so-called communist leaders with a "the ends justify the means" attitude that I do not share.

[-] JamesConeZone@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

What atrocities in particular do tankies accept

[-] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago
[-] JamesConeZone@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

you know what, fair, sorry brutalist comrades

[-] commiecapybara@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

I'm more of a fan of Socialist Classicism myself

[-] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To be fair killing nazis is pretty cool. We made some movies about it.

It is neat you are a fan of doing things where the ends do not justify the means. How do bathing moral decay like that feel?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Alterecho@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry, maybe I'm misunderstanding here. I think the delineation between authoritarian regimes and non-authoritarian governments is pretty clear - are you implying that all socialist and communist influenced governments are necessarily authoritarian?

[-] JamesConeZone@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago

No, I'm suggesting that authoritarian is a meaningless term unless defined specifically and was asking what theories of power and authority they had for making the delineation they are.

The derogatory term authoritarian is always leveled at socialist or communist countries, and never capitalist ones even though capitalist countries restrict rights for the majority of their populations by the very nature of the inherent power structure in capitalism. Even though communist countries usually enjoy far more decentralised authority, better voting rights, and higher political involvement in the populace, they are labeled as "authoritarian," the implication being that they need "freedom" aka capitalism

[-] PvtGetSum@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

What? The term authoritarian is thrown at non-communist/capitalist nations all the time. Syria, Nazi Germany, Libya, Franco's Spain, Modern Russia, and a million other instances. Authoritarian is a clearly defined term and is in no way exclusively applied to communist nations in almost any circles. It also happens to have been applied to most "communist" countries because most of them have been authoritarian

[-] JamesConeZone@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Notice you didn't name the United States which is just as authoritarian as modern Russia by any definition we choose (voting rights? participation in political process? allowed dissent? access to clean water? basic access to healthcare? food desserts? policies meant to keep people in poverty?). That's my point. It's an ethereal term unless properly defined.

We'll have to set Libya aside since after given "freedom," there are now literal slave traders everywhere.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

It's not clearly defined at all; try to give a definition of authoritarianism that applies to all of the countries frequently described as authoritarian, but not to any of the ones that aren't, and you'll see how vague a term it is.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[-] bagend@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

Can you give an example of a 'non-authoritarian government'?

load more comments (12 replies)

I think the delineation between authoritarian regimes and non-authoritarian governments is pretty clear

Why are you unable to explain it then?

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

I believe they are suggesting that, if "authoritarian" means anything, that every large state that has ever existed was "authoritarian," though some diffuse the authority through things like enclosure of the commons combined with strict property laws or other, older methods like religious law.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

And by blind. You mean checking the numbers on us propaganda and realize it is lies written in blood?

[-] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

See that’s the thing: the fact that the west lies doesn’t mean that the east tells the truth. You are heavily skeptical of what the west has to say (good) but mostly uncritical of what any communist government has to say (bad).

Capitalist countries have done horrible things, but so have self-proclaimed communist countries

[-] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

I have entire history books about how the west lies.

There is not a similar body of data about the loss of the east. Is it perfect? No. Do we have any reason to belive they are as bad or bad in the same kind of way as the people who oppose them? No.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
1106 points (88.2% liked)

Memes

45550 readers
810 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS