771

Charlie Jane Anders discusses KOSA (the Kids Online Safety Act).

If you're in the US, https://www.stopkosa.com/ makes it easy to contact your Senators and ask them to oppose KOSA.

"A new bill called the Kids Online Safety Act, or KOSA, is sailing towards passage in the Senate with bipartisa>n support. Among other things, this bill would give the attorney general of every state, including red states, the right to sue Internet platforms if they allow any content that is deemed harmful to minors. This clause is so vaguely defined that attorneys general can absolutely claim that queer content violates it — and they don't even need to win these lawsuits in order to prevail. They might not even need to file a lawsuit, in fact. The mere threat of an expensive, grueling legal battle will be enough to make almost every Internet platform begin to scrub anything related to queer people.

The right wing Heritage Foundation has already stated publicly that the GOP will use this provision to remove any discussions of trans or queer lives from the Internet. They're salivating over the prospect.

And yep, I did say this bill has bipartisan support. Many Democrats have already signed on as co-sponsors. And President Joe Biden has urged lawmakers to pass this bill in the strongest possible terms."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.sdf.org 45 points 1 year ago

here's the list of cosponsors ... if they're there, then they're certainly supporting it. It's worth contacting them in any case; they'll often send you a form reply saying their position on the bill.

[-] millionsofplayers@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago
[-] thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 year ago

That's disappointing ... but, enough pressure can get them to change their position (or, almost as good, ask Schumer not to bring the bill to the floor so that they don't have to take a politically costly vote). In the Senate Commerce Committee hearing, both Cantwell and Markey voted yes but said they had gotten a lot of calls and email from constituents who were concerned about the impact on LGBTQ+ teens so there was work to do before bringing the bill to the floor ... so the pressure is definitely getting noticed!

[-] ursakhiin@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One of my senators in on this list. His replies when a constituent disagrees with him are always a dismissal. The other senator who isn't on there is Ted Cruz...

[-] Shinji_Ikari@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

Damn had to call both my senators. I always hate calling because I have no doubt that it wont do anything.

[-] thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

Thanks for making the effort! On bills like this, enough pressure can make a difference -- we stopped KOSA from passing last year, and have a good chance this year as well.

[-] Adkml@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

God in a campaign defined by hilarious self inflicted pratt falls I can't believe they slapped Tim Karnes dumbass into Hillary vp slot.

And then tried to whitewash him as "your boring uncle (please don't look into any of his actual policy positions)"

Somehow neither of my senators customers cosponsored, but I'm guessing they'll both sign. We passed someone similar in my state recently, so I'm not expecting much.

I'll contact them though. I guess it can't hurt.

this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
771 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

34836 readers
17 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS