this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
566 points (99.0% liked)

Political Memes

7746 readers
3510 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 25 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

She sold $230,000 worth of stock in a biopharmaceutical company after executives tipped off friends and family about a key drug they were researching failing to acquire FDA approval. After news became public, the company's stock fell.

She was sentenced to 5 months in prison, 5 months of house arrest, two years probation, and recieved a 5 year ban from serving as an executive of a public company, and a fine of $195,000. She has also been denied entry into other countries like Canada and the UK for being a convicted felon.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 14 hours ago

... Isn't that almost exactly the same thing Vivek Ramiswamy did?

Started or bought a biotech firm, literally got his own mother to conduct a 'study', concluding a drug in development worked and had potential, when in fact everyone knew it was bullshit, then he sold all his shares before larger studies concluded more publically that the drug was indeed bullshit?

[–] reseller_pledge609@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Holy shit. That seems a bit harsh.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 48 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Or, stick with me, it's not overly harsh, it should just be applied to everyone who does insider trading.

[–] reseller_pledge609@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That was pretty much what I meant in a roundabout way. They're being extremely harsh on her when other people are getting away with the same or worse on a daily basis.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Oh definitely - Black Edge is a fascinating book on the subject if you're interested.

I'll go check it out thanks.

[–] D_C@lemm.ee 12 points 17 hours ago

Tricky, we definitely should not just let any convicted felons into the UK. No, there should be a cut off amount of 33 felonies.

Anybody with 34 felony convictions or more should definitely not be allowed in.
Or be allowed to be a president. Of anything. At all. Ever!

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Well, she was an uppity femoid who needed to be put in her place...

/s

Precisely my point. The other people doing this shit are getting away with it.