There’s already plenty of precedent for unilateral secession, the EU made it clear it was okay with that when it was Serbia, why are you raising a stink now?

Kosovo's secession wasn't unilateral, it was NATO-backed. Also, it followed a genocide I think I already told you that can't be arsed to go back and have a look at which hexbear I educated on that particular topic.

sounds like a proxy war to me, and if the US pulled out they would not have any ammunition,

The US has stocks but they don't have production capacity. Well, at least not nearly enough.

[–] sharedburdens@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Kosovo's secession wasn't unilateral, it was NATO-backed. Also, it followed a genocide I think I already told you that can't be arsed to go back and have a look at which hexbear I educated on that particular topic.

It was not including voting from the rest of the country of Serbia, that's what unilateral means jfc. Also the west only 'cares' about muslim life when it's time to use them as an pretext for intervention they wanted to do anyways, same with how they suddenly care about uyghers now.

There were documented examples of Romani having to pretend to be kosovar albanians to flee the NATO bombing because there was no resources made available for any other minority ethnic group.

The whole NATO backed dismantling of yugoslavia was criminal

The US has stocks but they don't have production capacity. Well, at least not nearly enough.

Yes I know, that's why they should stop getting Ukranians killed and pull all support.