DeGoogle Yourself

11239 readers

101 users here now

A community for those that would like to get away from Google.

Here you may post anything related to DeGoogling, why we should do it or good software alternatives!

Rules

Be respectful even in disagreement
No advertising unless it is very relevent and justified. Do not do this excessively.
No low value posts / memes. We or you need to learn, or discuss something.

Related communities

!privacyguides@lemmy.one !privacy@lemmy.ml !privatelife@lemmy.ml !linuxphones@lemmy.ml !fossdroid@social.fossware.space !fdroid@lemmy.ml

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml

CrypticCoffee@lemm.ee

Byereddithellolemmy@lemmy.world

chevy9294@monero.town

188

Getting unhappy about DuckDuckGo (lemmy.ca)

submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by pglpm@lemmy.ca to c/degoogle@lemmy.ml

103 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For several years I've been using DuckDuckGo instead of Google Search, and I've been overall quite happy with the results. Only rarely had I to resort to Google search (!g).

During the last month or two, however, I've found myself using the !g switch and Google search more than half of the time. DuckDuckGo shows no or few results where Google shows more (and useful) ones.

Still I don't want to give in. So:

Have you also experienced this worsening of DuckDuckGo?
Which other more privacy-respecting alternatives do you recommend?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've been using SearXNG during the last day and I'm quite impressed too so far!

True what you say about the problems behind net search. It's actually a very complex problem. In my opinion part of the problem is that there's a lot (most?) of rubbish out there. It's like a library with useful books of different genres all mixed together, and mixed with an even larger amount of nonsense books. Maybe a solution would be something completely different from indexing – but I have no idea what.

[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 1 points 22 hours ago

It's an old problem. From the very start of the net, you had to sort the wheat from the chaff. Back then, the BS was human-generated. Now we have the addition of AI crap. But anyway, they solved it already. Its called wikipedia. (Or any other community curated data source as well.) I'm not some wiki fan, but that's the world's answer to encroaching bad data. An army of real, very corruptible, infighting, weird-as-hell wiki editors is our last stand against the BS.