Global News
What is global news?
Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added tothe title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media posts
Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
- !legalnews@lemmy.zip - International and local legal news.
- !technology@lemmy.zip - Technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
- !interestingshare@lemmy.zip - Fascinating articles, captivating images, satisfying videos, interesting projects, stunning research and more.
- !europe@feddit.org - News and information about Europe.
Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
view the rest of the comments
The last line is also in the post, but I think it's worth stressing that they don't necessarily intend to halt all exports to everywhere. Although I don't like the Chinese having such diplomatic power over core industrial materials.
China has not dropped a single bomb in conflict since 1979 - 46 years ago. They have a nuclear policy of non-first-use. They have a consistent diplomatic policy of respecting everyone's national sovereignty, of resolving conflict through patience and mutual understanding.
Why don't you like them having such diplomatic power over industrial materials? Because they might use that power to push more nations towards mutual development and away from wasting resources on building more weapons in arms races?
When all countries can access important raw materials all countries use them to make things and all countries can develop new technologies, when a certain country in this case China would try to monopolise access to these materials the power imbalance can easily shift from working together to achieve common goals to working against each other using violence to make sure they don't end up as the weakest party. Look at how much wars have been waged the last 100 years because of oil.
This framing takes all comparison out of the equation. The reality is that oil was monopolized by the white supremacist patriarchal capitalist North Atlantic Eurocentric empire - the same empire that has been dominating the globe for 500 years; the empire that invented racism as we know it today; the empire that at one point dominated 80% of the world population; the empire that dropped nukes on civilians; the empire that starves entire nations hoping the desperation of the people will cause them to get rid of leaders who are not aligned with the empire; the empire that trained death squads to go and murder entire families in cold blood for decades across multiple continents.
China is withholding critical materials from that empire. It's not just a country holding something back from another country in a political vacuum. We're talking about the actual real historical process of resisting the bloodiest and most brutal empire humanity has ever seen. Yes, it will make the USA seethe and seek to dominate via violence but they already do that every single day. Starving the war machine is exactly what needs to be done right now for the sake of everyone and everything on this planet.
So then why exactly would it be better if China monopolise rare earth instead of selling it to other countries? Have you even read the article and my comment or are you just spilling your hate for the usa here? I mean be my guest but you're not really countering my point of me disliking China having diplomatic power over rare earths, just that you don't want the US to have it.
I agree with starving the war machine is exactly what needs to be done right now for the sake of everyone and everything on this planet. But this is beyond the scope of the argument, rare earths are mainly used in technology and the technology in weapons is mainly silicon based and China is not a big player in the global semi-conductor trade. They are a big player in the steel business, as far as I know they sell that to everyone as well including the US and Israel. So if it would be about withholding critical materials they would stop selling steel as well.
I don't really feel like you're actually trying to make a point here, except sharing your view of the world. Which is fine by me, but then why not write a post about that or something?
Also by saying stuff like 'the US is the bloodiest and most brutal empire ever seen' you come across (at least to me) as biased and people will not likely want to argue with you. I mean, haven't you had history in high school? There are a lot of massive empires in the history of mankind and the most powerful weren't the nicest per se.
Rare earth is absolutely crucial for the war machine:
https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3700059/dod-looks-to-establish-mine-to-magnet-supply-chain-for-rare-earth-materials/
https://www.army-technology.com/features/securing-the-rare-earth-supply-chain-is-crucial-for-defence/
https://nma.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/infographic_defense-01.pdf
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/15/us-is-unable-to-replace-rare-earths-supply-from-china-warns-csis-.html
https://www.army.mil/article/227715/an_elemental_issue
So i guess you agree China shouldn't have diplomatic power over such crucial materials.
I think that, of all the governments on the planet, there's no better government on the planet to have this particular power than the government of the PRC.
Cool, I'm happy for you
China has no more than what every other sovereign nation is entitled to: control over the resources in their territory.
The only requirement for trading with them is to play nice, which the U.S. isn't doing.