this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
1366 points (99.2% liked)

politics

23036 readers
3863 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

People voted, but the MAGA Nazis rigged the election, and we ALL know it. Too bad the Democratic leadership decided to help the MAGA Nazis cover it up, and declare that they won "fair & square." Rich Democrats like Schumer can be bought as easily as any Republican.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (3 children)

the MAGA Nazis rigged the election

I wish to investigate your citations.

It seems quite likely, but aside from the plain-sight rigging (gerrymandering, voter suppression, etc etc) I haven't seen anything except that one "computer science" guy whose numbers were contradicted by election officers.

[–] spamfajitas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 days ago

Not exactly a citation but it was pretty weird when someone found one of the DOGE staffers' participation in a hackathon around vote manipulation that got him real close with Musk as a result. Then he started wiping his connections once it was made public.

https://bsky.app/profile/denisedwheeler.bsky.social/post/3lhowh3ijgs2f

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The cascade of bomb threats in blue areas' poking centers of swing states didn't reach your attention?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I remember one. Do you have a list of them?

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There were over 30. Hitting at least 5 swing states. Some polling places were evacuated multiple times.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/06/election-day-voting-glitches-bomb-threats

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

The most alarming development on Tuesday was more than 30 bomb threats that were called into election locations, according to CBS News, including two that temporarily shut down two polling locations in Georgia. Both were “non-credible” and from Russia, Georgia secretary of state Brad Raffensperger said. Voting hours were extended at five polling places in Fulton county as a result.

Well that certainly sounds bad, but it also sounds like a weak attempt at creating chaos. There are 100,000 polling places, they emailed bomb threats to "more than" 30 and apparently the return address on at least some were russian domains. And they were declared false and the polling places extended hours.

It's bad, and it's clearly designed to help trump, but I can't see it swinging an election. Obviously it would add to the rest of it, but given what could have happened (i.e. MAGA chuds circling the parking lots with guns or some shit) it doesn't sound like that was much of a factor.

I mean, if 35 fake bomb threats can win you the presidency we should have figured that out before, right?

[–] el_muerte@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why are you excluding the "plain sight rigging?" Beyond gerrymandering, millions of voters were disqualified through ostensibly legal means that likely wouldn't stand up to legal challenge, but the Democrats were so concerned about taking the high road to pre-empt accusations of "throwing a tantrum" like the right did on January 6 that they just let it all slide.

https://hartmannreport.com/p/trump-lost-vote-suppression-won-c6f

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, for one that’s not new - they’ve been doing that for a long time.

For two, as an example, where do we get “millions” of voters from? Is it a non-corporate-news blog without citations? My preference is corporate news with citations since that’s going to have the biggest impact.

[–] el_muerte@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

You could read what I linked; guy lists his own credentials and experience in addition to his sources.

Still curious why "they've been doing that for a long time" is justification for you to just ignore all the unethical voter disenfranchisement occurring, especially considering the unprecedented scale (of which you be aware if you'd read my link).

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee -5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

So, the MAGAs didn't rig the election in 2020 and let Biden win, and then when they were out of power decided to steal it? You contradict yourself.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago

When Biden won, states launched literally hundreds of pieces of legislation to make sure that didn't happen again. Did you not notice?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Honestly, I suspect they've been trying trying their hardest to rig the last several elections, which is why they were so pissed off and in denial about 2020: they were incredulous that they rigged it and still managed to lose anyway.

But yeah, we've been having exit poll discrepancies, Republican success strangely correlating with the installation of Diebold voting machines with no paper ballot, outsized performance for certain Republican candidates even though Democrats won down-ballot races, and other weird anomalies for couple of decades now.

That said, I don't necessarily think that Republican rigging changed the 2024 outcome. I was watching them insert MAGAts into election boards, pack the courts, and gear up to refuse to certify votes and whatnot, so I was fully expecting "stop the steal 2.0" except successful this time. But then Harris gave a big middle finger to the left and subsequently underperformed so badly that she just lost outright, so the foul play wasn't even necessary.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The truth is that outright stealing elections via vote rigging is an incredibly risky strategy. If you do that, and you get caught? That's the kind of thing that can legitimately trigger an actual civil war. Rationally, it's just not worth the risk. It's especially not worth the risk when there are plenty of other shady but legal options available like gerrymandering, voter roll purges, corrupt judicial rulings, etc.

This dynamic is also why you rarely see companies bribing politicians with giant bags of cash delivered in the night. There's no need to engage in such overt bribery, as they've already constructed a system where legal forms of bribery (campaign contributions) exist.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What do you think they're afraid of? Every time they get caught doing something blatantly illegal, the only consequence is their base gets more enthusiastic. And they're not exactly trying to avoid a civil war now that they're in power.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

An overt civil war. The leader getting caught outright stealing an election is the kind of thing that causes people to start picking up guns.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 4 days ago

At this point I'm half convinced they want a civil war.