this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
655 points (99.2% liked)

politics

23101 readers
2948 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Van Hollen and Booker showing how representatives in government should be working for their constituents. I hope their aim is to be as annoying as possible until something good comes of it, but I worry Bukele will just arrest them and further erode the numbers we have in Congress.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Lets not conflate Van hollen and Booker.
Van Hollen actually does good with his position and I dont see skeletons in his closet.

Booker is a centrist zionist bullshitter trying to ride van hollens coattails. Booker has done some good things, but when the chips are down and his vote is needed, he doesnt show up. A DNC democrat that needs to be removed along with the rest of the so called "liberals". Lets make these people wear their voting history and not adore them for their purely performative BS or empty words.

Tired of empty cult of personality democrats.

[–] LePoisson@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well Booker is doing a hell of a lot more than most other reps when it comes to this, no need to shit on the dude.

Like, I'd take him over the GOP candidate that ran against him.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

so would I, but why is our yardstick always "is he better than a republican". Thats exactly how we lose campaigns.

[–] LePoisson@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's not but party unity is also important and we won't find perfection. Working within the confines of our real world is important but I agree that we need better representatives. Booker is just what our system gave us and he's a lot better than many alternatives and worse than others.

Mostly I think having a unified message and party is important but hard when you're dealing with people who actually care.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

Most would agree he sounds better and seems to do better somewhat, but it is still hard to trust him.

[–] CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Hard agree. Underrated comment.

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Donald and his many goons has many skeletons in his cabinet. The only difference is, he’s showing it in real time.

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world -3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If you hate liberals so much, why even vote for them? Just support a 3rd party or force all the liberals out and make them vote Republican.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Your comment makes no sense and jumps to conclusions. Maybe dont bother doing that.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world -2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is a ballsy move on Booker's part, and shit like this is exactly why nobody likes the left. Make better use of your time.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The left doesnt like centrists either. But neither of us can win without the other. So now what. The centrists would be in charge of the presidency right now if they could have held off sucking off AIPAC for 5 minutes but you lot couldnt even give a little bit on that-- you would rather lose to trump than give up on the genocide and bring the left and a critical portion of your base on side. That election was very winnable but you lot always seem to hate the left more than you hate trump. So what does the left owe you besides the back of our hand?

One of these days you ethics-free troglodyte centrists will have to admit you are in a coalition with the left. Neither of us has to like it-- and we absolutely dont like it-- or you, but we have to do it. And you need to ditch the zionists or get used to trump and losing every election till you do. You think the left will back down, we wont. We will never ever back your dirty genocide.