this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
74 points (98.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

60266 readers
1179 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nintendo is hoping to wrap up its lawsuit against gamer Jesse Keighin, aka EveryGameGuru, after he failed to answer the complaint. The game giant seeks $17,500 in damages for copyright infringement, including streaming pre-release games and sharing links to emulators. In addition, Nintendo requests a broad global injunction to prevent future infringements, even for games that do not yet exist.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I really hate how circumventing protection measures on their own device is considered illegal. It's my device, I should be allowed to do what I want.

Even the term "protection measures" annoys me, as it tries to protect their interests on my device.

Also, linking to an emulator should not be considered "trafficking circumvention devices". Making circumvention devices illegal is bad enough.

But the streamer is an idiot too as he was publicly streaming cracked games pre release. Streaming any game can be considered copyright infringement, although it's usually not enforced (it's free advertisement).

[–] mbirth@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)

But how is it deemed illegal when Nintendo "loses" pre-release games in the wild and somebody "finds" it and shows it off on YouTube? Game reviewers are bound by NDAs and have contracts with Ninty - but these "criminals" don't. So what's the crime here? Publishing something Ninty didn't want to get out yet? And how is this copyright infringement when he never stated that he's made a Mario game? Or is trying to sell Mario-themed stuff? It's an official game from Ninty, so what does this have to do with copyright? Where did he copy it?

Same with the "circumvention" ... if you can easily make a copy of the key from your own device - which you've legally bought and where you only need a paper clip to do it - what are you circumventing then? If you buy a lock, it usually comes with the keys on a keyring that's "locked" to the loop. Is removing a key from that keyring also "circumventing" then?

The big problem here is that most people doing law have no idea about the technical stuff. And until that changes we'll see lots of these ridiculous claims going through.

[–] pablodaniel 12 points 2 days ago

The legal system exists to be manipulated by rich people, for rich people.

We can blame all the rubes that said "they're a business and they need to make money!" for why these corporations now have the power of gods.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)