this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
34 points (94.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

60204 readers
1072 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Looking for a place to find the Windows version of this without paying $20 for a single version or $5/month for regular updates

EDIT: which one of you mad lads did this? https://codeberg.org/WetOtter44/StrawberryMusicPlayer

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anyone is free to build it themselves. Someone could even distribute their own build from the same source under a different name completely legally.

You could just as easily in the spirit of this community do it with the same name and code, same way they do it for cracked games. Don't tell me it's not done because there are security concerns, you have no way to tell if cracked games contain secret malware in them yet people still distribute and download those.

They bank on users being lazy and then pay for the convenience.

And also pirates to not outright rip them off, which seems to be working for some reason...

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

You could just as easily in the spirit of this community do it with the same name and code, same way they do it for cracked games.

You could, and unless you're trying to profit off it the original devs likely won't care.

And also [bank on] pirates to not outright rip them off, which seems to be working for some reason...

They already publish it under GPLv3, they want it to be free (as in freedom) software.

I don't care about any security concerns. If someone does not want to build it themselves or download from a third party they can buy it for their convenience. Or they can take the risk or find another way to install it.

~~For example I looked up whether Strawberry is on Winget, the Microsoft package manager for Windows. And look at that, it's completely free to download by the original developer [1].~~ @upstroke4448@lemmy.dbzer0.com

~~They only ask users who are too lazy and want to download through the Microsoft store for payment. I get why you don't like there being no binaries on their site by them, but they do provide free ways to install it. They just don't tell you about it.~~

[1] https://winget.run/pkg/StrawberryMusicPlayer/Strawberry

~~Edit: For anyone who does not want to click the link: winget install -e --id StrawberryMusicPlayer.Strawberry installs Strawberry on any Windows computer. Officially.~~

[–] upstroke4448@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I got a "no package found matching input criteria" using this method.

It also appears to only offer version 1.0.15 whereas the newest version is 1.2.10

If I'm not mistaken, 1.0.15 was the last windows / Mac version released before the dev paywalled them.