this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
1220 points (95.5% liked)

Fuck AI

2486 readers
1790 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You talked about information. Not public, not private, information.

Your responses heavily imply that you think public and private information should be treated differently, but you keep talking about how information should be free and open. So you are willing and believing that there are rules. So why shouldn't public information be public information while not being allowed to use for e.g. ai without permission? You can allow copying and modifying of information without allowing e.g. it being used for ai training. You can make that rule, just like you can different rules for private information than for public information.

I really don't understand what you don't understand.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Put it out and it's public. At that point it is folly to regulate. If personal information is taken and spread, the culprit has committed a crime but in my opinion the rest is folly. I thought it was obvious so I omitted the intensely self explanatory details

[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 hours ago

Oh so it is a crime! So you totally could make it illegal to use public information to train ai without consent. Making it really difficult to collect billions in funding. Thanks for the admission.