this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
24 points (90.0% liked)

Programming

19710 readers
377 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Feyd@programming.dev 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Moreover, codebase in pure funcional languages is hard to understand and maintain, that’s why they are rarely used in production.

This is incorrect. They are rarely used because procedural languages have momentum. It's way more likely you'll get Joe Codemonkey to learn and be productive quickly with functional features added to a procedural language than to learn and be productive quickly with an entirely different paradigm. So that's what happens.

[–] froufox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

So, basically that's what I meant, but without disrespect to Joe :)

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 1 points 2 hours ago

Fair. I just think is prudent to draw a line between natural difficulty and cultural resistance to change.