this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
144 points (94.4% liked)
FediLore + Fedidrama
2816 readers
113 users here now
Rules
- Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
- When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
- The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.
The usual instance-wide rules also apply.
Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)
Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.
Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc
(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama
Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse
Partners:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Read the "offending" text:
https://sh.itjust.works/post/36737764/18213591
This is hardly transphobia.
Seperate but equal, ey buddy?
Where does it say that? Please cite the exact part that calls for "separate" approach.
Be clear and specific.
One of the responses in that thread had the right idea
If you read the message that way and substitute the gender component for racial equivalents, I'd love for you to explain how the message isn't racist. And I'm sure there would be plenty of "moderate whites" that would have gladly explained it to me back then too.
The end result of your line of thinking is that one cannot recognize their own ethnicity as that would be racist.
It would be like you telling an ethnic Lemkos that it's racist for them to claim they are not white.
Except this is someone else talking about a group they're not a part of. Your comment is not related to the comment question, given the context.
Edit: and no explanation of how the original statement wasn't transphobic/racist after being aubstituted....
Depends - many people would say that not including transwomen in the category of "women" (without qualifier) is transphobia, and the comment literally says:
So the comment is basically arguing that "women" should only be used to mean "cis women", which some might (perhaps rightfully) consider transphobia.
Funnily enough, nobody cares about your opinion. You're welcome to make whatever decisions you want, just like the people on Blahaj can say that is transphobia.