172
submitted 1 year ago by pizzaiolo@slrpnk.net to c/energy@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

So for grid reliability, it would be better to build (e.g.) a distributed fleet of 100 MW reactors than a single 1 GW reactor?

[-] schroedingershat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah that would likely improve it, but then you're paying as much for the fuel as the renewable grid's total cost and much more on top of that for security and O&M. You also need to quadruple uranium mining overnight to just do the first fuel load for enough new generation to keep up with new wind and solar installs.

Rather than going to more and more tortured extents to try and make nuclear work, we could just do the thing that's working extremely well. In the absolute worst case where we assume medium and long term storage is impossible rather than not yet necessary, the total emissions from the residual thermal generation over tue next century are less than the emissions from delaying the transition to try and make nuclear work.

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
172 points (90.2% liked)

Green Energy

2194 readers
171 users here now

everything about energy production

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS