this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
133 points (95.9% liked)

Fuck AI

3107 readers
902 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blargle@sh.itjust.works 81 points 1 month ago (3 children)

"Why do they do this?" he asks. Because you don't fail them. Give them a big fat 0 on the assignment, no need to even tell them why.

Then if they beg nicely, let the flunked students do a make-up assignment in the classroom, in front of you, with a pencil and paper and their phones turned off.

[–] Caffeinated_Sloth@lemmy.world 101 points 1 month ago

Brother-in-law teaches AP English at a fancy high school. Assigned his favorite author whom he studied extensively in grad school. Kid turns in essay with fake quotes, obviously AI. BIL meets with student. Asks if they used LLM to write paper. “No.” “Ok I’ll give you 30 seconds to find any of these quotes in the book before I call your parents and give you a zero.” Tears flow. Parents called. F obtained. Boss teacher move.

[–] youngalfred@lemm.ee 69 points 1 month ago (3 children)

One of the best techniques for catching llm use is interviewing, which is now an approved technique in my jurisdiction.

They often don't have any idea what it is they've included, and cannot explain it or offer any further detail.

[–] parody 33 points 1 month ago

Nice

Widespread interviewing as a practice would really set a tone right?

“Yeah guys you can always use ChatGPT in her class but you HAVE to read and learn all the original source material FIRST”

Teachers: hehehe yesss yess learnnnn children

(Pair with on-the-spot writing tests with some accommodation for, IDK, various scenarios… shy kids, English Language Learners (ESL), etc.)

[–] br3d@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

This is a great example of how so-called AI is increasing the amount of work people have to do, not reducing it

[–] ApatheticCactus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

This was my entire technique for when i was studying for a test. I would do the practice test, then read through whatever I got incorrect and had to be able to explain fully what the correct answer was, why, and what made the other answers wrong.

Made the tests a breeze and my oral exam later cake.

Because I could explain it. I knew what i was talking about.

[–] parody 35 points 1 month ago

Feel bad for the guy

The ChatGPT rhetorical style is distinctive enough that I can catch it, but not so distinctive to be worth passing along to an honor council. Even if I did, I’m not sure the marginal gains in the integrity of the class would be worth the hours spent litigating the issue.

Arguments to be made for spending time now to set a tone of course!