World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
Even if you don't like their stance on some things, they provide very good information and actionable anti-Apartheid steps the average person can take. If you think one of their stances is counterproductive then just... don't follow it. I'm certainly for cooperating with unequivocally anti-Apartheid Israelis, but for purely tactical reasons it makes sense for BDS to oppose it. As the leading anti-Zionist international organization they kind of do set the tone for anti-Zionist action, and it's a lot easier to make a program more moderate than more radical.
Lemme reword that for you: "Boycotting South Africa also harms black Africans". Do you see the problem now? Israel must not be allowed to use Palestinians' economic security as a hostage against the international anti-Zionist movement; that'd basically mean giving up.
As I said above even if you think they're too radical or whatever at this stage of the anti-Zionist struggle anti-Zionist action will take the same form no matter where you ultimately want to end up. That aside, though, why the heck would I not want Israel gone? The prospect of peaceful coexistence with Israel is about as attractive as peaceful coexistence with Nazi Germany; dismantle that shit and build a real democracy in its place.
Thank you for making my point. Your goal is the destruction of Israel.
What other countries do you want dismantled?
Hmm... North Korea would be in second place on my list after Israel, and I'd throw a party if the US dissolved into its member states. Additionally Russia seems to be a good candidate since its current structure allows ethnic Russians in Eastern Europe to oppress everyone from Georgians in West Asia to Siberians East Asians. Oh I'd also redraw the borders of Africa along ethnic and religious lines and remove Xinjiang and other oppressed territories from China. I'm more surprised by your claim that there are no states in the world you'd like to dismantle and rebuild/reincorporate into something better; that seems awfully dedicated to a generally pretty shitty status quo.
You demand in Africa what you abhor in the Levant. That’s exactly what the two state solution wants.
Ethnostates for everyone, but the Jews!
I noticed you saying Levant instead of Palestine. If you really want peace why do you try to erase Palestinian identity? That aside yes, it's called nuance. Such borders are possible and desirable in Africa because ethnicities there follow nice geographic distributions, while in Palestine Jewish settlement had no geographic basis and therefore it's impossible to draw borders that would satisfy both sides. Also, Zionists have already shown that they can't be trusted to have their own state and not use it for ethnic cleansing.
This betrays your lacking knowledge of Jewish settlement.
Also I don’t know if it’s more racist towards Africans, Jews, or Palestinians. You seem to have expectations below the floor for all of them. They can be happy to have you as their white savior.
You do realize the borders of what supposed to be Israel included more than half the Palestinian population right? This betrays your lacking knowledge of Palestinian and Israeli history.
Okay if you think malicious European-drawn borders in Africa haven't been massive sources if instability and conflict in sub Saharan Africa then you should learn more history before talking about this stuff.
You will never get engagement when asking people defending Israel about South Africa or Rhodesia.
They will either ignore the question, or act confused why you'd being up 'countries that don't exist anymore' in bad faith.