this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

Harry Potter

959 readers
15 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5too@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As I recall the story, Rowling designed that feature of the game specifically to annoy her sport-loving husband. It's a feature of a fictional sport designed in spite. So really, it performs it's function admirably...

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I respect that, but I hate the fans who love it, it’s like they have never played or watched anything competitive before.

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Monopoly was also designed to annoy people, yet somehow people play it hoping it will be fun.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Children play it for fun because they get to play make-believe about money, play the banker, etc. Just handling fake money makes it fun to them because they are interested in the world on that level. The game itself is not fun to anyone, and I don't think adults ever actually play it without children...

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Last I played was as an adult with 3 other friends. To make it tolerable we had a rule that, on landing on someone else's property, we could either pay up or drink a shot of rum. Mistakes were made.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I used to and still play with my friends over and what we do is save the game state in writing for the properties, status cards, money, houses/hotels and we use rubber bands to keep games going for years.

New people mean new game, same people we just continue the last state