Fighting for equality, against discrimination and for a fairer world for us all is the only cause that actually makes sense atm imo.

Fighting for equity, as a man who's supposed to be at the bottom of the hierarchy, I spit on it.

Besides that, they‘re asking to amplify factual voices (instead of the extremes) which I find baffling that someone has to actually suggest this.

Because the actual definition of factual and their definition of factual differs. When they say factual voices, they mean, voices which they like.

Somewhat similar to feminists, when they say they just want equality (and I am ok with equality) they don't want equality, they want equity. They want quotas. Their definition of feminism and my definition of feminism varies. And people who say they want factual discourse have utterly disqualified themselves from saying that again, they just want their opposition to be censored. The last few years have proven that