this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
755 points (96.8% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

1725 readers
378 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you work for a publicly traded company and wish to become radicalized, you can divide the year's profits (plus money wasted on stock buybacks) by the number of employees to roughly estimate your personal green circle.

You might even add the CEO's compensation to the numerator. I hear LLMs are ready for prime time.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Profits? Or do you mean income. It would probably be smaller otherwise

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean profit = revenue - expenses. I cheekily suggested unsubtracting some expenses, e.g. excessive CEO pay, before computing profit per employee.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I assume you're also not including existing salaries in expenses then.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago

It was more of a "think about it" kind of comment than an algorithm. Glad you're thinking about it.