cross-posted from: https://pawb.social/post/24295950
Source (Bluesky)
this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
721 points (92.7% liked)
Fuck AI
3507 readers
461 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm not arguing. I'm expressing my internal responses.
I'm not trying to convince anyone, change any minds, and I've said so at least twice.
I'm just talking about the general subject matter. It applies to the OP concept, but isn't exclusively so, or directed at that as a primary goal.
I mean, you get that it's okay to be tangential, right? A post can be a springboard rather than the sole topic of discussion or expression. Hell, every response to a post is at least a tiny degree off since it's filtered through a human brain before being responded to. It's a matter of how far, or how broad.
The OP image even purely about accessibility of art, it includes capitalist motivations for ai generators, which I did directly address.
Not every comment has to be a debate. People can just talk, say their little thing and that be that.
So you're just derailing the thread. Cool.
If that's how you want to interpret it, feel free.
It's annoying for you to derail a thread with tangents, but whatever, I'm not a mod.
But don't fucking talk down to me because I was trying to stay on topic.
It's pretty fucking obvious why I was talking about accessibility, because that's what the thread is about.
I'm so fucking mad now holy shit.