this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
756 points (96.8% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

1725 readers
383 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Corn@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't get punished if you give up your citizenship and move to another country, and then stop paying taxes to America. You don't get punished if you decide to be homeless instead of paying your landlord 2K/mo to exist.

But realistically, you don't have a meaningful amount of choice when it comes to the bourgeoisie/government due to the difference in power.

[–] RaptorBenn@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Oh ofcourse, righhhhht just set sail and abandon all family and friends OOOORRR be homeless.

You've certainly proved me wrong there!

[–] Corn@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

OK, lets do a reading comprehension exercise. You have identified that it would be absurd to suggest that those two are meaningful choices, so can you think of a more sensible way to interpret what I've said if I'm not suggesting that?