this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
189 points (97.0% liked)

science

18505 readers
518 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] void_turtle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

It seems to me pumping out water to near vacuum while under crushing outside water pressure would be a significant power hog

Well, yeah. That's the point. It's a battery. Whatever energy you put in to pump the water out, you get some percentage (probably in the 50-70% range) of it back when you let the water back in. The point of these is to store energy from renewables whenever they are providing more power than the grid demands - otherwise the power would be wasted.

Edit: The paper claims 72% efficiency which is pretty good if I understand things correctly

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Yeah don't get me wrong- I get it’s a battery. But a battery that’s 5% efficient isn’t great. Now 72? That’s pretty incredible, I’d like to see that in action.