cross-posted from: https://lemmy.one/post/27858506

This post serves as notice that Lemmy.one will be shutting down in 90 days.

Unfortunately, the moderation features in Lemmy never progressed to the point required to continue maintaining this service, and Lemmy simply does not have the userbase to justify the cost of this service. Myself and the moderation team apologize for the inconvenience this will cause.

This is sad news. Hopefully the comms can migrate to other smaller instances.

Edit: just saw this

as this is a fairly active community we just wanted to let you know that this community is no longer federating with Lemmy.World due to defederation from lemmy.one for lack of moderation.

Our announcement can be found here: https://lemmy.world/post/28173093

We recommend migrating to a community on an instance that is maintained better.

I guess it's been an issue. I think the lemmy.one meant they needed better administration features

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

"Joining the fediverse isn't hard bro, your instance doesn't matter, just pick one."

"Stop using Lemmy.world, we need to redistribute to smaller instances."

The number of times I've heard these fucking lines when people discuss why Lemmy/the Fediverse isn't growing like corp-owned alternatives...

[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

“Joining the fediverse isn’t hard bro, your instance doesn’t matter, just pick one.”

It's true, especially in cases like this when users have 3 months to pick another instance.

“Stop using Lemmy.world, we need to redistribute to smaller instances.”

Also true. Should LW go down in 90 days in a similar way, is it better if LW has 50% of the users, or a smaller number?

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I don't disagree with the sentiments behind these statements, but you're basically asking a fish to leave their large school to join a smaller school because it will benefit the species as a whole if the species is divided into multiple schools rather than one giant school. While it might be true that the species is safer that way, it's much more dangerous for the individual fish to be in a smaller school than to stay in the large school.

In other words, it's safer for the fediverse for users to diversify, but is safer for the individual to join a "too large to fail" instance. If a user's instance goes belly up and they lose their account and everything associated with it, it's functionally similar to the entirety of Lemmy going down as far as that individual user is concerned, because unless you're a serial lurker (in which case it doesn't even matter what instance you're on if you're not contributing) who wants to invest years in a social media site just to lose your account? Most folks are going to leave rather than start all over. And most folks are going to make the decision that is in their best interests over those of some website. I know every time I see another instance get shut down or defederated, I'm relieved I decided to sign up via .world, even if it's sluggish at times.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

who wants to invest years in a social media site just to lose your account? Most folks are going to leave rather than start all over.

It wouldn't feel like fully starting over to me. Sure migrating communities I created would suck but at least they would be archived accross many instances.

I'm not attached to my account itself. I just like my admin team.