Funny

9673 readers

1151 users here now

General rules:

Be kind.
All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

example@reddthat.com

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works

1191

It WORKS (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 days ago by Stamets@lemmy.world to c/funny@sh.itjust.works

150 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] b34k@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Guess that’s the difference between union and non-union employees.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It is absolutely not, but yeah being in a union could entice you to do better work. I wish I was.

[–] b34k@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Reasons why companies with union jobs might provide better services due to employees being more personable and reliable:

Higher wages and better benefits attract people more serious about their work
Higher wages and better benefits reduce stress in the life of employees, making them more personable on the job
Unions negotiate employee contracts to limit things like quotas, resulting in lower stress, happier employees

There are probably other reasons too, since I’m just going off the cuff here, but it absolutely makes sense to me that the company with non-union jobs in this industry provides the worst service.