this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
359 points (99.4% liked)

memes

14864 readers
5371 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Sometimes...... Man sometimes this is too damn accurate.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Second suggestion is a bit creepy.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 2 points 56 minutes ago

Anyone that says they haven't thought about being at their own funeral is lying. Or maybe well adjusted. I don't really have experience with the latter.

[–] MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Personally I find the background image to be the creepy thing.

[–] vivendi@programming.dev 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What's wrong with being a furry?

[–] MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

On its face? Nothing. But their bad elements come up a lot quicker than other kinks. Also, my comment is in regards to the meme.

Edit: disregard. I thought I was responding to someone on a meme asking what would ruin us being able to talk to animals.

To answer your question in response to what I said. On its face? Nothing, I just find them and their porn unsettling. Provided consent and non-harm; do whatever you want.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 13 minutes ago
  1. This was for meme. Otherwise I use some pretty nice Firefox wallpaper that I found.

Possibly AI, I don't know.

  1. The "funeral" suggestion is fake too. I just thought "funeral" would sound funny there, and well of course I couldn't leave it with a regular wallpaper.
    Under dictionary you can add shortcuts. In this case the shortcut was literally space, so it would show up after typing a space.
    Yeah, nothing is real, mate.

As for the fandom, I am not sure you got it right, since you mentioned "kinks", "consent" and "porn". It isn't a sexual thing. Or rather about as much as you make it. Same as cosplay. But yeah, it's still a thing in both.
Partly why Manokits and Dutch Angel Dragons are my favorite species. They're both strictly SFW, especially Dutchies.
In short, both species have no sexual organs, but Manokits may have nippleless breasts purely for sexual dimorphism. Dutchies are more strict and straight up don't even have genders, by default being refered to by they/them, but other pronouns are allowed.

As for how strict the community is, about this strict:

One of the most swift and severe bans you can obtain is having “not safe for work” (NSFW) adult-themed art of your Dutch Angel Dragon. The ban is [effective] immediately upon its discovery and is a complete ban from both the community and right to use the species.

The community and the creator (Ino) alike does not tolerate the existence of adult artwork of the species; whether something is considered “adult” or not is subject to Ino’s discretion. Dutch Angel Dragons by nature are a family-friendly species, and one of the required aspects of the species’ core physiology is that they do not have any digestive or reproductive organs of any type, nor can they ever manifest any type of sex-specific body features because sex and gender does not exist in the species. Anything that is intended to resemble or function as such is not permitted; regardless of the owner’s claims it is NOT a Dutch Angel Dragon if it includes any of these elements. We also strongly discourage anthropomorphic art with sexually-related dimorphism in general (eg. female breasts) but this alone is not a bannable offence, it is merely not an ideal representation of the species.

Source