this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
977 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

70267 readers
4035 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] astro_ray@piefed.social 107 points 2 days ago (3 children)

TBH, I'd AI can screw up the education system so fast then it is the fault in the education system. AI is bad, but our education system is not good either.

[–] hansolo@lemm.ee 52 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This 100%.

The education system was not OK, and has not been for a while. Its main goal is limiting liability, not educating kids.

[–] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

I will take limiting liability and running with it. Not just the schools, but the kids and parents too no one wants to be responsible and step up to fix the problem.

[–] FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

One of my professors had an AI policy. Using AI for an outline or to find resources was okay, as long as it was cited with the exact prompt used. I think having rules for how to use AI on her assignments actually cut down on use compared to professors who outright banned it.

[–] spamfajitas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago

Sounds kinda similar to how Wikipedia was approached by instructors. I remember an English teacher proudly proclaiming she had participated in a "Kill Wikipedia" seminar at a convention. Just a few years later, they're instructing students on how to properly use Wikipedia as a starting point and not a primary source.

[–] Eggyhead 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’m literally teaching a course to teachers on how to use AI in the classroom so that the students don’t use it as their magical answer dispenser.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What are the headline recommendations?

[–] Eggyhead 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I had the class build a database of ideas, but one I really liked went like this:

You put a bunch of quiz questions into an AI song generator. The students listen to the song and try to provide the answers afterward.

You can make it really stupid and funny if you want.

Another would be to have AI produce a “podcast” about some topic, maybe Elvis interviewing Churchill about who Darwin was. Tell it to use some key points you want the students to take note of, then let them hear it and talk about it afterward.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like very inventive ways to include AI in teaching and make it fun and interactive.

How are you modifying what you teach? Wikipedia reduced the focus on learning facts, what does AI remove from the syllabus? What areas should be strengthened to leverage AI?

[–] Eggyhead 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well in my case, I leverage AI to extract specifics in long texts, such as level-appropriate vocabulary and collocations related to the topic. I can do this with YouTube video transcripts, for example,then use a different tool to quickly spit out learners definitions of all the words extracted, example sentences with fill-in-the blanks (emphasis on the topic of the lesson), and whatnot. I have to verify that the definitions and example sentences are suitable, then I slap everything together in a handout template I have in Affinity Publisher, along with some topic-related discussion questions. The students watch the video, and then I give them the handout afterwards.

That’s just one example.

I know of a company producing experimental AI tests, that basically put you in a D&D role playing scenario. It shows a scenario on screen, narrates a situation, then asks you to respond. Based on your response it’ll take you in one direction or another, the whole time grading your skills behind the scene. The students don’t even know they’re being tested. At the end, it prints out a score, but it feels more like the end of a video game match than a test.

I think that’s cool af.

We are certainly entering the young lady's illustrated primer stage of education.

A physics accurate D&D where you play as macgyver could be really cool.