this post was submitted on 21 May 2025

579 points (97.7% liked)

science

18664 readers

353 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

m3t00@lemmy.world

Joleee@lemmy.world

laverabe@lemmy.world

DeadPand@midwest.social

laverabe@lemmy.zip

579

Is red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the opposite (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)

submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by dwazou@lemm.ee to c/science@lemmy.world

106 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Science has been canceled until 2028

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Found the American.

[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

True, but also want to emphasize that this has worldwide implications, the NIH is a major contributor to clinical research. Probably more harmful if it produces garbage data than less data