this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
13 points (81.0% liked)

Linux

11409 readers
134 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GolfNovemberUniform@infosec.pub -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Rolling release Fedora based distro? Now that's something new.

Also Brave is good.

[–] bisby@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Brave might be a fine browser, but the CEO is infamously anti-LGBTQ and was anti-mask during the pandemic. And the whole crypto-coin association and injecting affiliate links into search results... Everything about Brave makes me want to avoid Brave. Is there anything magical about it that make it any different than other chromium browsers that makes it worth supporting right wing crypto bros?

[–] gradual 1 points 1 month ago

Is there anything magical about it that make it any different than other chromium browsers that makes it worth supporting right wing crypto bros?

No, just lots of shilling and useful idiots.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)