this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
161 points (98.2% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

6638 readers
255 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post is on-topic isn't in the article or self-explanatory, you must use a second (high-quality) source to explain why your post fits the criteria.
  4. Articles should be high-quality sources. For a rough idea, check out this list. If it's marked in red, it probably isn't allowed; if it's yellow, exercise caution.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] underline960@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

This is the second face eating article I've seen from sarkariform, and it's starting to make me suspicious.

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 6 points 3 days ago

Just read up on them. Supposedly, according to mbfc, they lean far left, have no credentials, and didn't seem to provide any sources:

TheSarkariForm.com exhibits a Left bias, particularly in its coverage of President Donald Trump and his administration. The site frequently publishes articles that portray Trump negatively, often without providing sources or evidence to support the claims.

A casual search has the first articles on 1/11/25, so either they are new or they have been purging old history. Add to this that they didn't have any archive.org results from before 1/25/25, that's another suggestion that they just started.

I'll take it with a grain of salt,