this post was submitted on 26 May 2025
235 points (98.4% liked)

Actually Infuriating

598 readers
41 users here now

Community Rules:

Be CivilPlease treat others with decency. No bigotry (disparaging comments about any race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexuality, nationality, ability, age, etc). Personal attacks and bad-faith argumentation are not allowed.

Content should be actually infuriatingPolitics and news are allowed, as well as everyday life. However, please consider posting in partner communities below if it is a better fit.

Mark NSFW/NSFL postsPlease mark anything distressing (death, gore, etc.) as NSFW and clearly label it in the title.

Keep it Legal and MoralNo promoting violence, DOXXing, brigading, harassment, misinformation, spam, etc.

Partner Communities

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

But piracy is a crime...

EDIT: This guy is a clown

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It doesn't actually kill AI, it would just kill any open source solution and create a monopoly for the handful of companies that either have all the data or can afford to pay for it.

There's like 5 publishing houses, 3 record companies and a couple of websites that "own" almost all training material.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lol lmao

That's only if they want to try tonprofit off of it.

Free use still allows you to train your own AI.

And the tech would be better if nobody profited off of AI

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Copy left license would be the best scenario but I don't think that is what we are getting sadly. That being said, you need the big foundational models. The average individual cannot train their own AI from scratch.