91
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
91 points (85.3% liked)
United States | News & Politics
7213 readers
529 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
The constitution also doesn't deny the right to a stable climate, if that is what you mean.
It just has nothing to do with it.
Justify the existence of national parks then
Not sure why you're here 4 days later...but nothing in the constitution says they can't have national parks.
Again, the issue is just it has nothing to do with it. There's easily other avenues to go about than the constitution.
Why are you here? And if nothing in the constitution says we can't have national parks, nothing in it says we can't regulate a stable climate.
I don't even really disagree with you that there are better ways to go about it. It's just stupid to agree with their claim.