this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
10 points (100.0% liked)

MTG

2169 readers
18 users here now

Magic: the Gathering discussion

General discussion, questions, and media related to Magic: the Gathering that doesn't fit within a more specific community. Our equivalent of /r/magicTCG!

Type [[Card name]] in your posts and comments and CardBot will reply with a link to the card! More info here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Evu@mtgzone.com 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Scryfall (and before it, magiccards.info) has been outdoing Gatherer for years, but I don't think Wizards of the Coast can afford not to have a searchable card database that they control. For all I know, they've offered to contract the work out to Scryfall, but Scryfall refused, or it would have been too expensive. But if WotC decides to just leave it up to Scryfall, and Scryfall folds, or makes an editorial decision WotC doesn't agree with, that would put them in the difficult position of having to revive and update Gatherer on short notice. They need a resource that they own. And as a player, I would rather they not own Scryfall. I think Scryfall is better because they get to make their own decisions.

[โ€“] SiegeRhino@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

the unspoken reason for keeping gatherer around is that they want the official source of card images to be low res images that make for bad proxies