460
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 1 year ago

Choose one god. Tell me if you believe in it or not. The answer is binary.

And your answer is a cop-out. God with a capital G, the god called God, is understood to be the Judeochristian deity. But whatever, you're obviously not discussing in good faith so let's end it here.

[-] flamboyantkoala@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago

Not a cop out it’s just not black and white. You seem to really be struggling with the fact someone could be in a state between believing in God and not.

You’d be surprised how many Christians will tell you they struggle with believing from time to time. The ones who will admit it at least. Many do and to many God is different from one to the next.

[-] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 1 year ago

It's not a struggle on my part; the whole idea is stupid.

If I ask you if you believe that dogs are real, the only options are yes or no. You cannot be unaware of the state of your own belief.

[-] flamboyantkoala@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago

A dog is a real tangible thing. Easy to say yes. You’d have to be delusional not to believe it.

God isn’t a person or thing, you can’t touch it, and the evidence is old written and many translated texts. However there is an obvious gap in our understanding of how and why we are here. So is God involved, was there a guiding hand can totally be a question that hasn’t fully resolved itself in my mind.

[-] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 1 year ago

the evidence is old written and many translated texts

That is not evidence. They're stories in a book that have not been corroborated by anything real later.

When you talk about evidence you need to refer to objetive, material, reproducible evidence that can be examined by skeptics, and that is valid both for the scientific method and before the law.

If your notion is unverifiable by definition, is not worth considering.

So is God involved, was there a guiding hand can totally be a question that hasn’t fully resolved itself in my mind.

You don't have any legitimate reason to ask the question in the first place. The whole idea makes no sense.

this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
460 points (91.4% liked)

Atheism

3984 readers
9 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS