this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
231 points (97.5% liked)

politics

23990 readers
3631 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Biden added: “Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn’t is ridiculous and false.”

God damn, so politically stupid to not realize that these political attacks works since he's still defending himself from these same political attacks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Bro, do not even fucking dare to pretend to know how I vote or how deeply involved I am in politics. I've got decades of experience on campaigns in the US.

If the Democrats continue to do what you are expressing, and thats a key fucking word, because they already tried to do what you are outlining, they will lose all future elections. There is no hope that the imaginary centrist, the actual most unreliable voter in the fucking world, is going to fix this. Democrats only shot at retaking power is to embrace their actual left wing base instead of trying to be diet Republican.

I keep having to repeat it for you. You don't know what the fuck you are talking about. We already tried your approach: Its a fucking disaster.

Remove the centrists, remove the corporatists. Kick them to the fucking curb for the worthless, and key word, unreliable pieces of shit that they are. Give the people something they actually want to fucking vote for and they will.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Bro, do not even fucking dare to pretend to know how I vote or how deeply involved I am in politics

I'm not. I said a bunch of 'if' including acknowledging that if you're already actively engaged then you're not to whom my advocacy is addressed.

I've got decades of experience on campaigns in the US.

Nice. I applaud you for that.

If the Democrats continue to do what you are expressing

I'm advocating for the eligible voters who don't vote in one or both of the primaries or the general to vote. I'm telling them to stop waiting for "the Democrats" to altruistically change track and cater to them, because "the Democrats" aren't going to do that.

Democrats only shot at retaking power is to embrace their actual left wing base instead of trying to be diet Republican.

If the left wing base comes out to vote. I'm arguing that they have not been coming out to vote (in the primaries, to ensure the nomination of left wing candidates), and therefore the Democrats do not target them to win the votes they don't cast.

We already tried your approach: Its a fucking disaster.

When? Primary turnout sucks. Looking at all the even years back to 2000 I'm not seeing a single state hitting 50.

https://statesunited.org/resources/voter-turnout-since-2000/

Remove the centrists, remove the corporatists. Kick them to the fucking curb for the worthless, and key word, unreliable pieces of shit that they are

That's what I'm saying. I'm just saying we the people should do it by voting instead of losing elections by not voting.

Give the people something they actually want to fucking vote for and they will.

I don't believe they will. They didn't give Bernie to the people of Vermont or AOC to the people of New York or Ilhan Omar to the people of Minnesota. All of them ran in the primary for the Democratic nomination and won by the voters (you probably already know but Bernie won the Vermont Democratic primary for Senator in 2008 then turned it down and ran as an Independent). So let's take our future ourselves by voting. If the numbers are there and they come out in the primaries then we get what we want.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There isn't enough time in the world to go through and correct the factual inaccuracies in what you just wrote, let alone the strategic mistakes you are advocating for.

I’m advocating for the eligible voters who don’t vote in one or both of the primaries or the general to vote. I’m telling them to stop waiting for “the Democrats” to altruistically change track and cater to them, because “the Democrats” aren’t going to do that.

What it comes down to: You want voters to be different than they are.

They aren't. They are how they are. Meet them where they are at or lose.

If the left wing base comes out to vote. I’m arguing that they have not been coming out to vote (in the primaries, to ensure the nomination of left wing candidates), and therefore the Democrats do not target them to win the votes they don’t cast.

Who the fuck is it that you think does the actual boots-on-the ground volunteering on these campaigns? Fucking Jake Tapper viewers? You have no fucking clue how elections work and who the actual volunteers are, and it shows.

You've drank a giant bottle of getting mixed the fuck up kool-aid when it comes to cause and effect, and your entire approach to electoralism, one we've shown as a failure, depends on basically "wishing" voters to be different than they are. They arent.

I don’t believe they will.

Bro, no one, not one single soul, should care what you believe. You don't have a strategy and you are advocating to lose another cycle to fascism.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You want voters to be different than they are.

I want non-voters to vote. They aren't voters if they don't vote. I'm not addressing my comments to people who are already voting. I ~~do~~ don't know why you find this to be such a controversial take, but you do you.

Edit to fix typo.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago

I do know why you find this to be such a controversial take

Its not a controversial take. Its an incredibly common, vapid, worthless, and idiotic take, and it needs to be shut down at every turn. Because your take, this exact take you are outlining: it dominated the Democratic narrative and strategy in 2024.

And most importantly: it 👉 loses👈 👉fucking 👈 👉elections 👈 .

It needs to be resisted at every fucking turn because this weevil brained take is quite literally what Democrats banked on and it handed all branches of government to fascists.

Any one for whom this is as far as their thinking is capable of taking them; they need to be ignored. Permanently.

We couldn't afford to suffer this kind of idiocy in 2024 and yet we were forced to. It need to be killed in the crib.