Games

19568 readers

402 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

171

Borderlands 2 is temporarily free to grab on Steam, as it continues to be review bombed for non-Randy Pitchford tweet reasons (www.rockpapershotgun.com)

submitted 3 days ago by volkerwirsing@feddit.org to c/games@sh.itjust.works

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You will not use exploits or illegal or unauthorised means to interfere with or adversely impact any other user’s ability to use the services as intended; to gain unfair gameplay advantage; or to gain access to virtual items or other content to which you do not have valid entitlement. This includes the use of cheats or so-called ‘mod menus’, unauthorised mods, hacks, glitches, or any other technical exploits, and phishing, scamming, or social engineering.

In legalese, does 'this includes' mean 'additionally' or 'specifically'?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Additionally.

It's outlaying the parameters and then it goes on to give some common examples so a rational actor can get a good idea behind the meaning of the parameters. It's not an exhaustive list of all activities that could violate their parameters.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Does it blanket forbid those even if individual examples of those things don't violate the parameters in the beginning or does it forbid them only if a particular instance under those categories violates the first part?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can you give an example? Purely for academic intrigue... Not advisement purposes.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Any mod or glitch you use in a singleplayer game. Reshade could be considered a 'mod menu'

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's a grey area, that you may win if this hypothetical were litigated. Their parameters are broad and vague, so I could easily see a claim that it is unfairly giving you a better game play than others. Nothing about their parameters mentions multiplayer, so one would assume it apply's to all play styles.

In the extremely unlikely scenario this came to some kind of litigation the determining factor would probably be the question of whether there is anyway for players to compare single player gameplay at all in a reasonable way? If they have a leader board for single player or anything like that, including even social media tracking single player stats then I think it's possible it is determined to be giving an unfair advantage.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Also note that this is for a game without competitive multiplayet