this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
207 points (88.2% liked)
Animemes
2455 readers
903 users here now
Memes related to anime. Animemes.
Rules
- Don't be a shithead.
- Posts must be a meme with anime or related to anime or weeb culture.
- Use NSFW tag for lewd/ecchi. No explicit hentai.
- Nothing illegal, copyrighted, etc
- Repost only if the last post is 6 months old.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
pretty gross whitewash of the rape, torture and enslavement of many thousands of women and children by colonizers
I'm pretty sure that the second page is depicting the scene before the rape takes part, both natives look displeased because they were forced to be there. And the left one could be a kid.
Idk what's being whitewashed in this metaphorical rape illustration tbh.
People are completely media illiterate and see the "main"character of the picture being happy and thus immediately think it's a celebration of the bad thing
And all of the straight up genocide.
Yeah,that post wasn't even funny by 4chan standards.
edit: fair, i removed my toxic comment.
Given NJM's comment I can fully understand his downvoting. People can disagree with your comment for more than one reason.
Let's not weaponize people's votes, thanks. Probably the single worst "feature" added to Lemmy.
It has its uses but most of them are bad
Honestly, I don't see any real reason anyone should be able to see anyone else's votes that isn't nefarious. The only reason people would want to see how others vote is to be able to call a hate mob to harass someone for "voting wrong."
Regardless, people should be allowed to vote however they want, even if that means its not the way you or I would have voted a comment or post. People vote on posts and comments for a trillion different reasons. Someone might agree with a comment but they feel it is off-topic or de-railing the conversation so they downvote it, and then you get terminally online serial harassers attacking them because "they don't agree" or some other awful reason.
Ultimately, this ends in posts getting no more down votes, except for maybe spam posts, and then upvotes also being low because nobody wants to get attacked for how they vote on posts. Certainly a great way to ruin engagement in an online platform, IMO.
Like, just remove votes entirely at that point.
A number of communities and instances disable downvoting which helps moderate the behavior altogether. Either people agree and upvote to promote, or they GTFO and/or feel ignored.
I think it was a response to give out needed mod tools that just ran across transparency as an ideal.
sorry what?