this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
5 points (100.0% liked)

D&D Next - 5e Discussion

2718 readers
6 users here now

A place to discuss the latest version of Dungeons & Dragons, the fifth edition, known during the playtest as D&D Next.

Join our discord! https://discord.gg/dndnext

-- Rules --

  1. Be Civil. Unacceptable behavior includes name calling, taunting, baiting, flaming, etc. Please respect the opinions of people who play differently than you do.
  2. Use Clear, Concise Titles.
  3. Limit Self-Promotional Links. External links to blogs, kickstarters, storefronts, YouTube channels, etc, must be related to DnD and posted no more than once every 14 days. Affiliate links are never allowed.

This is a new community and the rules are in flux. Please bear with us (and give your feedback!) as we navigate building this new community. Thank you!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I'm out of the D&D world these days, but it is hilarious to see them still trying to find a way to make psionics work in a way that doesn't suck.

The first D&D character that I built was a 4e psion, and I loved it. But for some reason they crashed and burned with their attempts in 5.0e

I liked the idea that instead of spell slots you gained a number of cantrip-like abilities that can be strengthened by spending power points. To me, something like that is the best way to do it. It gives the greater flexibility compared to spell slots that people want out of psionics, without the insane power level that made the mystic so unpopular.

I also intensely disliked a bunch of the names for things they used, at least in some of the old psionics UAs. I don't remember what it ended up looking like, but I recall Mind Thrust at one point being changed from your basic "attack their mind" into having a physical knockback effect, and other similar ideas I really didn't like.