this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
610 points (98.9% liked)

Greentext

6476 readers
1826 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 9 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Your exact same argument could be made for murder, for sex crimes, for hate crimes, etc. Just because some people might occasionally want to commit these acts, does not make them okay, because they hurt people.

Open relationships already exist. There is no limit on what kind of relationship you can define with your partner, so there is absolutely no "necessity of lying and cheating". That is just an excuse for people who don't give a shit about hurting people.

[–] NewDark 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It sounds like the point they're making is more: "we internalize and understand relationship norms through serial monogamy, and maybe more people would benefit from reconsidering if that is what they want."

Not: "You wanna cheat on your partner? Just do it lol."

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Maybe I misunderstood it then, it seemed like they were presenting this as a defence for people who cheat, like "don't blame them, blame the society which ultimately causes it".

Edit: reading again, it very clearly says "... Instead of vilifying it [infidelity]..." So they really are trying to say "stop getting upset about it"

[–] NewDark 2 points 4 days ago

I think the "it" there can also be the human nature to want to love/fuck many people, not just a single partner. I'm being charitable as I don't think that's the point they're trying to make, but I'm not the commenter, so idk.

load more comments (4 replies)