NewDark

It's close enough for a soundbite or a headline.

In a sick way I'm glad it's the language I was raised with. On the other hand, maybe the British should have conquered less.

I think the "it" there can also be the human nature to want to love/fuck many people, not just a single partner. I'm being charitable as I don't think that's the point they're trying to make, but I'm not the commenter, so idk.

He was better on crack.

I fail to see how this forces the government to do anything really.

It might change the calculus enough in that direction to be impactful, but that's about it. They're servants to capital, not us.

It sounds like the point they're making is more: "we internalize and understand relationship norms through serial monogamy, and maybe more people would benefit from reconsidering if that is what they want."

Not: "You wanna cheat on your partner? Just do it lol."

I think there's a big difference between fucking consenting adults while their partners are OK with it, and fucking children.

I shouldn't have to spell that out but here we are.

Sounds anti-semetic. /s

Playing a single character is usually not going to go well. Some characters are that flexible or always at least not a bad choice to play, but it's very limiting.

It's not quite rock paper scissors, but you'll certainly see heroes that have specific strengths and others that can exploit particular weaknesses, and the items excentuate the strengths or paper over weaknesses depending on your needs for a game.