this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
191 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
167 readers
133 users here now
Share interesting Technology news and links.
Rules:
- No paywalled sites at all.
- News articles has to be recent, not older than 2 weeks (14 days).
- No videos.
- Post only direct links.
To encourage more original sources and keep this space commercial free as much as I could, the following websites are Blacklisted:
- NBC.
- CNBC.
- NY Magazine.
- Substack.
- Tom's Hardware.
- ZDNet.
- TechSpot.
- Ars Technica.
- The Verge.
- Engadget.
- TechCrunch.
- Gizmodo.
Encouraged:
- Archive links in the body of the post.
- Linking to the direct source, instead of linking to an article talking about the source.
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"The woman chose the man that didn't explicitly say that he was going to rape her so that man has a right to rape her anyway"
The reason for the sexual language is that it's more immediately intuitive/tactile to understand for most people.
https://www.ktvu.com/news/newsoms-office-to-fund-freeway-camera-pilot-program
https://www.gov.ca.gov/2024/04/02/governor-newsom-announces-contract-to-install-480-new-high-tech-cameras-in-east-bay-to-improve-public-safety/
https://calmatters.org/newsletters/whatmatters/2021/01/newsom-national-guard-potential-violence/
"I voted for him to put his dick in my mouth & he did it. Later, he said he'd do it again & again. I could have left him, but I stayed hoping to get fucked instead."
The cameras weren't installed assuming the data would've been shared. In fact it's illegal to do so.
The cameras were installed though. You gave them the opportunity.
Fair
But
Its still illegal to share the data and people didn't give "consent" to share the data
All it takes it them telling a judge they need to use it to make it legal. Sue them if you think it is illegal, but my guess is they'll file evidence under seal & have the judge tell you they had authority.