this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
1057 points (85.0% liked)
Firefox
20329 readers
110 users here now
/c/firefox
A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.
Rules
1. Adhere to the instance rules
2. Be kind to one another
3. Communicate in a civil manner
Reporting
If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've read the article and I don't understand the issue.
I don't care. He represents Brave just as little as he represents Mozilla or Javascript.
I don't care. Why should that be a reason not to use the browser? It doesn't have a feature that no other browser has either, oh no.
I don't care. If you care about maximizing websites' profit, you should use Chrome (with no adblock).
I don't care. Browsers are extremely bloated anyways.
I don't care. They didn't try to scam anyone, they just offered services/features for those interested in Web3.
I care a little, but not much. Claiming it's anti privacy is ridiculous. The website can see you're using Brave no matter whether you're using an affiliate link or not. But it's still something a browser definitely shouldn't do without user consent (and an option to opt out).