this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
924 points (93.8% liked)

Political Memes

9176 readers
3110 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee -5 points 1 month ago (6 children)

If you think your AR-15 is a match for a full on SWAT team, or an armored vehicle, think again.

This isn't a video game, and there aren't any respawns in real life.

Ask the folks at MOVE how well fighting back worked for them.

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's about getting an AR-15 into the hands of every queer person, brown person, and the allies of such. A single AR-15 is no match. A squad of them in the hands of a mobilized neighborhood however...

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee -4 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Gestapo thugs have to sleep sometime.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

The part where Ukraine has demonstrated that they are vulnerable to drones that are explosive.

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

That can be easily neutralized by parking a few Cybertrucks around it when they aren't looking.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

you're thinking the way they want you to think: that fighting face to face is the "only" way to fight

it's because they know they don't have the numbers

https://militarysphere.com/guerrilla-warfare-in-american-revolution/

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

The only reason the Americans won is that they had the French Navy on their side.

The French went broke supporting the Americans.

Also, the Brits were willing to cede to the Americans. The Brits kept getting US cotton and they were going to get it cheaper because once the British empire withdrew the Americans could expand into the Native nations the British had treaties with.

It's not comparable in any way.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Oh, people can't resist a government in the modern age? Tell that to Bashar al-Assad.

[–] AlexLost@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

I own exactly zero guns. Urban warfare is as likely to get massive casualties on both sides. Ever heard of an IED? Freedom isn't free and democracy dies with a whimper, not a howl. You want to whimper and cower, or stand for the future of your country? Nazis didn't go away because we asked politely.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You have totally missed the point of arms being a deterrent. YOU are the one thinking in video game terms.

Anecdote: There have been two times I would have likely got my ass kicked out in the woods had I not been open carrying. Like magic, this fucker who loathed me was very, very polite.

For anyone else coming along; Guns are not magical "get off me" totems. You have to put in the time and effort to practice several skills, safety at the top of that list. It is not an easy solution.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Almost as if the other guy didn't have access to many, many more weapons and the legal right to shoot you.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Huh, can't wait for your instance to shutter.

Doesn’t matter whether shithead had guns of his own, the fact that he saw one on the person he wanted to victimise had one and he decided he didn't want lead poisoning.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or he could smile and wave and then shoot him in the back...

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Ah, yes the what if game. You've lost.