The constant "there's a dang Cheeto in the white house!" comes with the implication that anyone who wasn't "the Cheeto" would be meaningfully different in the role.

Particularly in 2016 - 2020 the implication was Hillary, now it's Harris, as that's who he ran against.

Edit: It's a focus on the individual in the role rather than the system itself, despite vast evidence that the problems are long term and systemic. Whether the intention or not, it's undeniably a liberal defense of the broader system itself.

[–] constnt@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then say that.

Op says, 'I hate coke" and we respond "Pepsi is also bad" . This doesn't ever even imply that soda just sucks. It just shuts down discussion, makes us sound contrarian.

[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're literally defending Harris in the next thread. Don't play coy.

[–] constnt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Please show me. Cuz Ive only posted in a MMORPG sub before this. Oh and a post about mold at one point.

[–] m532@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Your comment further down in this very thread: "A Harris presidency wouldn’t be threatening nuclear action."

Liar, coward, imperialist