this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
21 points (76.9% liked)

Stolen from Facebook

792 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Taking as comparison the fingers, maybe rhe art style of the artist is simply crude? Also what about the flag?

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

the flag is the same as in the photo, they're just making shit up.

[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 2 points 4 weeks ago

Puppycat appears to mean through another comment that the symbols being distorted, or at least different from each other, are signs of a generated image. Having some experience with doodling myself, even if very sporadically, I think such a small detail is a major PITA to make perfect, so it feels pretty human-like to me.

[–] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

um.. i feel like the flag is pretty self explanatory?? thats a pretty perfect textbook example of what to look for, unless the artist very very deliberately wanted their art style to look ai generated. which they have done an insanely good job at doing if so.

[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 6 points 4 weeks ago

Dunno what is your expected level of alleged human-like quality, but taking myself as example, when I want to doodle something and a detail is overly small or unecessarily hard to do, unless I copy-paste the given detail through software, I just go the simplified route. So to me, it looks very like it's human-made.

[–] frankyboi@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 weeks ago

Look like someone with bad drawing skills.