595
submitted 1 year ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WittyProfileName2@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago

pushing bisexuals down the list in favor of pansexuals.

Bad take, considering bi erasure exists.

[-] DADDYCHILL@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

im not trying to do a bi erasure, bi people are valid. im just saying as someone who was bi sexual who later became pan sexual after learning about the term i just think changing some of the letters around would be good ways to raise awareness about different genders and sexualities in the acronym. so many people know what lgbt is but they dont really know the plus part. the first four are really important to the broader conception of gender and sexual identity as a whole. look if we can change the flag i dont think the acronym is sacrosanct either, i do however think we need an acronym.

i think lesbian, gay, and bisexual should be lower on the acronym. i think trans people should be first since they are receiving most of the targeting and attacks out of any group in the community right now, i think pansexuals, asexuals, and nonbinaries could really benefit from a representation bump. TPAN, rolls off the tongue. we can keep lgbt too. nobody got rid of the pride flag after the progress flag. both can exist at the same time. i just think its a representation issue.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
595 points (94.9% liked)

World News

32075 readers
859 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS