WomensStuff

What an idiotic, rambling comment. You ignore basically everything I said and latched on to a couple random pedantic points, while accusing me of being pedantic.

Quite literally, you are trying to argue that distress and anger are different emotions, despite both of them coming from the same place.

You are basically saying that Pepsi isn’t cola flavored because the can it comes in doesn’t look like Coke.

Except the distinction does matter, because testesterone is connected specifically to anger and not to general "distress." Women are just as likely to experience feelings of distress as men, that means that there's a significant difference in the context of this discussion between the two.

Not ALL men are violent. OBJECTIVELY. Do you agree?

Of course. At NO point did I ever claim otherwise. What I have claimed is that, generally, statistically men are more prone to violence, which is just as objectively true as the fact that not all men are violent, despite your claims to the contrary.

they ALL have TESTOSTERONE. They would ALL be violent.

This is complete nonsense. Testosterone only makes people more prone to violence, generally, statistically, it doesn't make every single person violent.

This is a ridiculous strawman that you've constructed to divert the course of the conversation into utter nonsense. It has nothing to do with anything I said.