this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
86 points (100.0% liked)

World News

718 readers
983 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person, don't post hate.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

NATO military doctrine doesn't require as many tanks has the Soviet doctrine, which Russia is still using, does.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So, what - do you think this is just mismanagement of funds? Possibly to meet the minimum defense spending, I suppose. It could be.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Well it's the military, so mismanagement of funds is a given. But that's not what I'm saying.
I'm saying that this number was probably aligned with the rest of NATO already, and that NATO doesn't expect to lose 180 tanks by driving them single-file on a highway.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's 180 in that first batch. Contract apparently is for 1,000. With a joint effort of production, so the last batch will be fully assembled in Poland.