this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
159 points (91.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

35946 readers
1677 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Star Wars universe does have lasers of all scales and power levels.

Yet literally no one uses them well on a personal scale.

The Jedi (and Sith for that matter) imbue it with a power of magical stone, and then...use it as a saber.

To balance this stupidity, stormtroopers, clones and droids all use slow, non-continuous energy blasters. With actual lasers, they could insta-kill any Jedi, but they cannot, because otherwise the movie wouldn't exist.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

star trek, and some other scifi genre captures it better, SW is more for children, it also magic-tech in it, so not really a true scifi.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a Sci-fi space opera.

Literally. No point in it being hyper realistic

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My dad likes to contend that Star Wars is a western. And he makes a compelling argument with how it indeed has all the tropes and hallmarks of a western.

[–] nwtreeoctopus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago

Basically a mix of Westerns and Samurai flicks.

[–] erin@piefed.blahaj.zone 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

SW is for children is not a great take. It's just not sci-fi, and shouldn't be judged as such. It's a space fantasy, and it leans into the camp and the suspension of disbelief. They use wings and aerodynamics in space. Destroyed ships "sink." The good guys never get hit and the bad guys die in one shot. Now, the new movies were absolutely disappointing, but Star Wars was never sci-fi, at least not in the ways this discussion is defining the genre.

[–] Kickforce@lemmy.wtf 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Not all star wars is the same. While I agree that it is space fantasy rather than sci-fi, some of it is more serious and well made than the rest. I have absolutely loved Andor, Rogue one and Solo, and the first and second series of the Mandalorian. It's starwars with very limited force use.

While the space flight isn't realistic, the wings aren't really a problem. Look at the space shuttle.... Real spacecraft with wings.

[–] erin@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, I wasn't complaining about any of those things. I think they're awesome. X-Wings and TIE fighters are definitely not using their S-foils for reentry gliding though. I'm a huge Star Wars fan. I think it requires a level of suspension of belief to engage in the storytelling, because it's not supposed to be at all realistic. There is also plenty of Star Wars media that is definitely not for kids or fits closer into sci-fi, but even Andor, the most sci-fi of the Star Wars media I've watched, was definitely still leaning on its fantasy roots.

[–] Kickforce@lemmy.wtf 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Indeed the X-wing "wings" are more supports to mount weapons on than they are airfoil. Tie fighters have a totally different approach to flight.

Andor is of course beholden to the fantasy world it is set in, it did convince me as a sound socio-political story. The fears and distrusts both of the rebels and the military/ intelligence services, the anti Ghorman propaganda, it's awesome.

[–] erin@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

Andor was awesome. Considering that the fighters in Star Wars do aerodynamic flight and sound is not just added for effect but audible in universe, I've always subscribed to the head canon that in the Star Wars universe, space is a gas of some sort. We also see people in space that die of suffocation, not pressure shock. The name S-foils also implies a similar purpose to airfoils, but the canon isn't even consistent on that. Some TIE models explicitly use their S-foils aerodynamically in atmosphere, but other ships are ambiguous.

[–] Redfeather@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] erin@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 23 hours ago

I don't think a defense of the most-hated parts of the prequels is a great argument. This comes across as George Lucas misreading his audience and trying to defend a product that missed the mark for most of his serious fans.